[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BuzzFeed_News#Notable_stories
https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/delivering-on-our-us-data-...
Rather unlikely that the one published earlier is actually a response to the one published later.
One does not follow from the other.
That said, yes, and? It seems like pointless whataboutism. If other countries are concerned about US access to their data, as the US seems to be with TikTok, they'd be well justified to take similar efforts to try to localize resident's data storage. Do you find it common for people to suggest otherwise?
--
i'm not suggesting nor question whether it is good or bad, or what they should do my sole purpose is to put things into perspective
the question here is not where the data should be hosted, the question is who can have access to that data
if it was where, for data sovereignty, a bill and the problem is solved
but here, they make it linger, because the motive is not about any of that, TikTok's user data is useless, the motive is to weaken and picture China as the evil, manipulate the public opinion to get favors whenever things are becoming dirty in SEA
it's the same tactics the USA did since their birth, and it predates the existence of "America"
what's the point if everything is always one sided, and nobody gets to question the way the world is rotating?
in apocalypse we find life
you are bad at geopolitics