I don't understand how there can be such a push for a vote of no-confidence in three C-level people with no mention of the CEO that ostensibly chose, managed, and retained them.
https://www.afr.com/wealth/people/crypto-billionaires-fortun...
Not very strategic or well thought out.
The CEO and his C-suite all have agency.
If one member of the C-suite misbehaves professionally, you are suggesting that the one who hired/managed him/her should be punished alongside the errant person by virtue of association, rather than by establishing concrete evidence that they both acted in concert?
Premature judgement is what is causing a lot of commenters to elevate these anonymous claims to the level of facts, rather than wait until an interested party (like an external investigator commissioned by the board of directors, or a regulator like SEC) is able to substantiate any or all of the claims.
I don't work for Coinbase, so I am in no position to speak on whether the CEO is at fault or not. Any attempt to do so as an outsider with limited information would be pure speculation.