And I'm not talking about the quality of your product. I mean to use Jordan Peterson without consent or reference is not bold as other are saying, but is verging on criminal.
How can you even calmly post this on HN?
But that "professor" voice is extremely recognizable as him.
The entrepreneur voice is familar as well but I can't place it. It might be a better blend of more people.
Found this from comments on ProductHunt
> thanks for a great question. Candidly speaking, I’d say we’re taking a “move fast” and “seek forgiveness later” approach. The plan is a) to try to apologize and get a license if there are demands and if that doesn’t work b) create new synthetic voices that are not of real people.
This infuriates me to no end. People with that kind of mentality fuck up the entire startup ecosystem for everyone.
So that makes this intentional and the excuse of "I didn't know any better" no longer plays.
I really don't see the outrage. If I do an impression of Jordan Peterson am I also in violation of a social code?
It's like someone selling stolen credit cards and then claiming they're doing nothing wrong because people who are buying them are the ones committing the crimes.