A pretty bad article to be honest, just creating confusion.
Emacs buffers are not the reason why functions like forward-paragraph exists.
That’s just normal abstraction (in programming).
Emacs buffers are not the reason why functions like forward-paragraph exists.
That’s just normal abstraction (in programming).
A buffer is essentially a tuple
(contents, point, mark, definition of a "paragraph", ...)
So the article is correct - without buffers 0-ary (or implicitly 1-ary, since all evaluation is in the context of a buffer) functions like `forward-paragraph` could not exist. And without a wide library of such functions, the correspondence between normal editing commands and idiomatic Emacs Lisp wouldn't exist, and most benefits of Emacs would be lost.Not that I don’t love how Emacs does it, but I just think it’s not that closely correlated to the notion of what is a buffer as the header of the article implied