But even if you were... you reply to one person, but more than one person reads your reply. If you match the stupidity of the person you reply to, then everyone else who reads it concludes that you're just as stupid, and that your position is just as badly-supported. So that approach is pretty counterproductive.
How about you tell all here what is a reasonable sample size for being able to rule out wizards? How many people have you seen shooting fireballs out of their hands?
You're obviously mad at someone, and it sounds like it's someone religious, who believes in miracles. But you didn't reply to them. Instead, you came here to rant at us.
I'll give you the last word, because I have no interest in going further with this conversation.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29655736 (Dec 2021)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29547334 (Dec 2021)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27477147 (June 2021)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22272727 (Feb 2020)
(Note that last one: "Please don't do tit-for-tat flamewars on HN. It's off topic, nasty, and tedious.")
Would you please stop getting involved in flamewars on HN? I don't want to ban you but you keep doing it.
I actually am trying...