My claim is that "argument by year" may be a cute rhetorical flourish, but it's completely worthless as an actual argument. You used it, and I'm calling you on it. If you want to argue against peoples' irrational beliefs, find a better way to do it.
[1] A strawman is a weak version of an opponent's position, not a completely unrelated position.
If you are up for a more serious question, how about, do you believe humans can walk on water or not?
You repeatedly seem to be trying to dodge, deflect, ignore, or misrepresent that. It's getting annoying.