The point the author is making is that that "due process" happens after your hypothetical front door is kicked down and dog shot, unfortunately.
I believe for example, that it is extremely rare to have your door knocked down here in the UK. The police will generally politely knock and or ring the doorbell, and only knock your door down if you refuse to let them in.
It is a problem with the justice system.
It is also a problem with the registrar. The registrar operates in this environment and is seemingly breaking official ICANN rules.
I highly doubt that this is going to be the case if the warrant says that you’re wanted for child abuse imagery or human trafficking. I’m sure they’re lovely for small infractions, though.
There’s no need to send the swat team for a non-violent non-organised criminal, monster though they may be.
> I highly doubt
At least on paper UK police aim to take a more evidence-based light-touch community-building approach to policing, so I'd be curious what reasons you have to doubt this claim?
The assumption that US morality and culture applies globally is tiring and misses out on an opportunity for learning through comparison.