Is there evidence for this? Couldn't null be valid: those choosing to emigrate are most likely to be willing or wanting to leave that nonsense behind?
Caste has no place in America. It's antithetical to our founding values. Plenty of Indians emigrate while leaving their caste identity, and any will to act on it, behind. There may remain implicit biases. But these can be aspired to be corrected versus assumed to be the default.
In the modern, technologically connected world, it is much harder to leave nonsense behind. Even if you move to the other side of the world, you will still be exposed to your home country's politics through easily obtainable TV channels and through your Internet acquaintances on worldwide social networks. In a way that was impossible in 1920 or 1820.
Either way, as more and more of a certain ethnicity/race enter a country for the purposes of bettering their financial prospects, many of these immigrants reinvent the social dynamics of their origin country. This is how enclaves are created. And while many of the "enlightened" Indians have left behind explicit caste discrimination, they didn't leave other practices behind either ( e.g. parental authoritarianism, arranged marriages, etc.).
A different geography doesn't necessarily produce a different worldview. Every immigrant arrives with his own family values, religious dogmas (or lack thereof), and modes of thought that lead to these aforementioned conflicts.
> Caste has no place in America. It's antithetical to our founding values
If we're excluding slavery as a de facto caste system, then sure. However certain behaviors being antithetical to our founding values doesn't make them easily solvable problems.
> If we're excluding slavery as a de facto caste system
I agree that caste and slavery have overlap, but banning slavery was about making our country more in line with its founding values. America is an evolving project, not a single point in time.
We still have a long way to go, and are regressing in many ways of late, but still more in line with those values than we were at the founding.
One example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Irish_Americans_in_...
I thought one of the big benefits of multiculturalism (that all big businesses love to tout) is how it brings diversity of cultural values to the workplace. Well I guess mission accomplished because now you've got the indian caste system in the workplace.
Caste is something most Indians grow up with, you dont really lose it just because you go to another country. Most kids of these Indians fortunately dont really care about caste.
One may not lose it. But one can reject it. That's the gist of my implicit biases line.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/sinn-féin-raised-12...
"Caste" as being your ring in the social hierarchy is present in almost any culture or civilization, and prejudiced treatment of people in either higher or lower social rings is definitely (in my opinion) a part of American culture. This country definitely offers special treatment and privilege to those in higher "castes"... Hell, even just having a Southern accent in America will grant you a prejudiced treatment in many settings.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Brahmin
and
https://www.bostonmagazine.com/2006/05/15/the-new-brahmins/
and
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2004/03/what-s-a-boston-...
To be clear, are you talking about open immigration? Not that it’s truly open or easy to immigrate, but you seem to be hand waving in that direction.
What do you think should be done about this? It’s not clear to me that closing borders somehow fixes anything.