The liar’s paradox, decidability and undecidability (being core ideas in computer science) directly imply that it is scientifically undecidable what a man; or a woman is.
Those are (in fact) questions for the liberal arts department and broader society, and the answers are usually settled by social convention and democratic discourse.
A computer scientist will likely understand why the above is true. The rest might be tempted to downvote this assault on their intuitions.
Update: 3 people who don’t understand computer science disapprove of this comment (this is a running score)
Also, you’ll collect a lot more downvotes now that you’re obnoxiously talking about your downvotes.
People who understand computer science also understand exactly what I am talking about. Because I explicitly said what I am talking about: undecidability.
It is scientifically undecidable what a man; or a woman is. That is a question for the liberal arts and broader society.
If you don’t understand the reference to the Liar’s paradox you have self-selected yourself as somebody who doesn’t understand computer science.
Similarly: if you prefer prose (which is for humans) and shy away from logic (which is for computation) your interests are better aligned with the “woke” liberal arts; than with computer science.