Perhaps this means that apple might start documenting the really fun breaking changes they seem to put into every release.
if so, that would be grand.
if so, that would be grand.
This is why Apple will continue to be a failure in any IT department larger than a startup. The only reason MacOS is supported in larger businesses is because the whiny graphics department would riot if they took their Macs away. And I don't want to hear "but I do all my software development on a Mac!!!1!" Yeah, in an unmanaged configuration on your rogue developer box, sure, whatever. No one is running thousands of Macs outside Apple and if they are they're not doing it without many third-party system management kludges and an army of people to support it. And the whole thing hangs on by a thread.
Apple's enterprise support is a joke and will continue to be unless there are major changes. Even Linux and FreeBSD (!) are better at this.
Looking back to see if you were ever right, I see a 2013 article[1] claiming
Google explained that it’s managing a fleet of over 43,000 Macs its employees use
as of now if you start at Google and want to use a platform other than Mac you have to make a business case
[1] https://news.yahoo.com/google-wants-employees-using-macs-not...
No need to simp so hard for Apple bro. The criticism levied by the OP is completely valid. Apple breaks stuff on the regular, without a care, in large-scale deployments with real desktop applications it can be a total shitshow.
https://www.techradar.com/news/ibm-exec-says-macs-are-way-mo...