Some of those companies are doing hiring freezes right now but many are not.
Salary bands are adjusted within the USA by zones where NYC/SF/Seattle are zone 1, zone 2 is 90% of base, zone 3 is 85%. With equity component staying the same.
Europe/Brazil/Canada are on a totally different lower pay scale.
Source, I have a lot of friends who are former/current staff engineers at a variety of Bay Area companies. I also was a staff engineer at coin.
Also if you want to earn something like this in cash go work at Netflix when they start hiring again. They give you the option to be paid in cash.
While equity in a public company can go down and go down significantly it’s liquid. Especially in companies like coinbase that don’t have a 1 year cliff, are public, it’s a significant part of your comp and not funny money like you get in many early stage companies.
Truth
The salary I banked at the beginning of the month is guaranteed.
Especially not at coinbase, whose stock has imploded to the tune of -75% just this year, and more since IPO.
Ask for what you can get and realize that you are worth more than you realize in the right situation. And never begrudge a peer who earns a lot.
$224k/yr is below what a midlevel/L4 SWE would make at Google in total comp.
Also, Total comp in 224k is more like $400k. 15% bonus target is normal with a possible 2x performance multiplier. 100k/yr gsu stock. 50% 401k match. To say nothing of the perks. On-site gyms, fantastic food, free shuttles.
Not that I’m advocating for working for goog, just saying.
These are also roughly speaking first-year salaries. You can expect a refresh grant equal to 1/4 of a new-hire equity grant each year vesting over 4 years, plus a staff-level can get a signing bonus of $50-100K.
After 3-4 years in a staff role you can easily be making $1-2M/yr.
It's probably not 380K base, which is very high, it's likely 300K base + 25% bonus target = $375K, give or take. That's not hugely more than any of the mega-caps have been paying in cash comp for staffie's for like 5+ years.
Refreshes exist but this is a total lie. I'm staff at Google. Nobody at L6 is making $1M in annual compensation, even if they have their sign-on equity and three refreshes. Let alone $2M.
The point is that 3-4 years tenure is enough for significant appreciation in equity, especially in the earlier grants. Let's work an example, for someone who started 3 years ago.
- May 2019. -
Base: $225K.
Equity: $880K grant = 785sh @ 1120/share = 220K.
Bonus: $60K.
Total: $500K.
- May 2020. -
Base: $236K.
Equity: 196sh @ 1428/share = 280K.
Equity: $220K grant = 154sh @ 1428/share = 55K.
Bonus: $63K.
Total: $634K.
- May 2021. -
Base: $247K.
Equity: 196sh @ 2411/share = 473K.
Equity: 39sh @ 2411/share = 94K.
Equity: $220K grant = 91sh @ 2411/share = 55K.
Bonus: $66K.
Total: $935K.
Trust me, if they've been there for 3-4 years, they're making more than 1M in total comp. If you back my example out to someone who started in 2018, those refreshers easily push them into 1.2-1.4M, and factor in promo grants?
And Google wasn't giving $880k sign-on equity grants for L6 in 2019. You can't use todays numbers for past cases. And then you are choosing a peak pay before it drops dramatically after the sign-on grant ends. And after all that, you aren't even at 1M, let alone "easily 1-2M". With literally everything being used to pump numbers up, you don't get to where you cite.
So yes, there are people at loads of companies who make way more money than advertised because the stock ballooned. But this is a completely useless way of analyzing compensation.
I couldn't disagree more. If half your total compensation is derived from stock, then you better be looking at yourself not just as an employee but as an investor. And part of that means making projections.
It's about bringing an investor mindset. Do your own analysis, make your own projections. It's literally half your paycheck, you owe it to yourself. It won't perform the same, sure, but your job as an investor is to analyze the quality of that investment. Will it go up or down? How much?
Whatever you vest is ordinary income. It's your compensation. Just because it's not fixed in advance doesn't mean it's not total comp! Don't pretend otherwise! :)
So while you're saying one thing here, you're actually doing another.
Disc: Googler.
Note that Facebook certainly was.
And even if you managed to hit your sign on grant at just the right time, you still were below the proposed “easily 1-2M”.
You can make a lot of money working as a staff engineer at a top tier company.
That number (or higher) has been the norm at a huge swath of stable and profitable tech companies for a decade+.
I am making an assumption that 380 is total comp and not base salary. I don’t believe that Coinbase is paying 380 base salary for any non-executive position.
The OP specified salary- if they're referring to total comp, that'd be an important distinction for them to make in the future. Its anybodies guess what the actual value of equity in a total comp package will be a year from now. As an example, if you took a $380k TC package at Shopify 6 months ago and 40% of that was equity, it's now looking like $280k.
It's basically what the salary looks like in the USA at a top tier company in a top tier city. Go look at https://www.levels.fyi/ for base salary excluding equity. Equity goes up by level.
As for this role, it sounds basically like a mid career engineers salary. i.e 5-12 years of relevant experience. Hard to know exactly because geography impacts salary bands at Coin.
I can't remember what HR tells us, but I think we are targeting pay for the top 25% of companies/engineers in the USA.
"The OP specified salary- if they're referring to total comp, that'd be an important distinction for them to make in the future."
I work at Coinbase, it's not salary, it's total comp. I'm assuming the OP was a bit confused. At least half that figure is equity.
"Its anybodies guess what the actual value of equity in a total comp package will be a year from now. As an example, if you took a $380k TC package at Shopify 6 months ago and 40% of that was equity, it's now looking like $280k."
As I mentioned earlier, each year Coinbase give you a new equity grant priced at the start of the year. I.e thirty day average, I believe.
So if the equity tanks one year, the next year you will be reset to 380k total comp. Assuming of course we are not in a multi year bear market and you don't get laid off, which is always a possibility in tech.
Also some companies, such as Netflix allow you to take a cash only salary that would be comparable to this.
Perhaps because the company lost half a billion dollars last quarter and is in a controversial space facing regulatory scrutiny?
>That number (or higher) has been the norm at a huge swath of stable and profitable tech companies for a decade+.
Yeah, stable and profitable.
So what? Last year COIN made $3.62B earnings. They may need to shift at some point, but I think it's incorrect to act like 1-2 bad quarters means a company should completely shift their plan. If anything, it's more important than ever to hire top people - which requires a decent salary.
These are not "top people", they are average people. This isn't Lake Wobegon, where all the kids are above average.
>So what? Last year COIN made $3.62B earnings.
Only in Silicon Valley do people say "so what" to profits and quote revenue numbers. We're literally talking about high costs. Selling dimes for a nickel is simple, but not sustainable.
2021 Fiscal Year https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/COIN/key-statistics?p=COIN
Of course past results are not indicative of the future, but in 2020 and 2021 COIN had positive earnings.
https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001679788/8e5e050...
COIN had a bad quarter and expects to have another. Are we seeing a shift away from crypto and tech or repricing which things will continue again? I think it's too soon to tell, hence my so what. COIN needs tighten up and plan for what's next. It doesn't mean they need to assume crypto is going to zero and the company is over - yet.
Wouldn't you expect people to be paid more for working in a risky space? Also, please not Coinbase just announced a hiring freeze.
https://blog.coinbase.com/employee-note-an-update-on-hiring-...
That's not insane for a staff engineer. A little high, but not impossible at any big tech company.
Your past experience can be a proxy for the role and level you're targeted for and thus, the comp target.
The market is hot, and might be in a bubble, but these are comp numbers that you could have seen even five or six years ago at the FB, Snap, Lyft, even Googles of the world.