Agree. Only fine men like George Soros and companies willing to pay enough to lawyers should be able to do so.

Also open source software should be banned, as everyone can search for security exploits. I see it the same with flash loans, etc. It forces DeFi protocols to safeguard against all attack vectors, resulting in a much more secure environment.

Well, they’re kind of limited in what they can do with it because of the requirement to make a profit in an atomic transaction.

But I think the conversation we should be having is, do we want to move towards more resilient markets, given that the additional security will carry a heavy cost in terms of productivity?

I’m sure there are arguments both ways but it seems like we don’t have the full picture yet.

What benefit is there in restricting the use of large amounts of capital to actors who control that capital free and clear?