The irony of the CEO of twitter presenting information supposed to add nuance and context to a debate… using a twitter thread where every paragraph is an open invitation to misinterpretation.
Nor is there anything in that thread by CEO that shows us he has no incentive to lie and hide behind "personal data not accessible to outsiders". But trust us, they're human! You just can't check!
It's mind-blowing how anyone can be naive enough to believe that, without some sort of personal incentive (e.g. Twitter employee or some dir-level whose bonus depends on the buyout)
In other words, is it OK to straight up lie to fulfill the fiduciary duty?
If the answer is yes, then the CEO is less believable.