It says the following in the article if you've read it and can also be found in [0] as the source:
“Depending on your role, you may need to work on titles you perceive to be harmful,” the communiqué continued. “If you’d find it hard to support our content breadth, Netflix may not be the best place for you.” [0]
Given the plummeting subscribers, cancellations and password-sharing chaos and a cratering stock crash, they are cleaning up the dead wood and costs, including this and it sort of makes sense here.
Therefore, I find the evidence in this article and the findings in the internal memo highly likely to be true, otherwise they would have kept those workers as if their actions did not impact the company.
Unfortunately archive.org isn't working, so it's hard to check whether the text really is new, or something that's in place for years.
> A Netflix spokesman said the company updated its culture page on Thursday for the first time since 2017. He said Netflix had spent the past 18 months discussing cultural issues internally with employees. The new language was added, he said, “so that prospective employees could understand our position, and make better informed decisions about whether Netflix is the right company for them.”
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/netflix-to-employees-if-you-don...
Yeah, that culture page applies just as much to Conservative employees offended by the presence of pro LGBT themes, criticism of religion or minority casting.
This isn't the anti-woke own the Post or HN commenters who never read past the title want it to be.