Why should Free software advocates need to "do better" than to argue from literal first principles?
Fourier could call his transform a "process" all he wants, but that does not make it patentable.
So yes, "oh, math."
Fourier could call his transform a "process" all he wants, but that does not make it patentable.
So yes, "oh, math."
I'm not in favour of patents at all, but the entire "it's math" argument has always seemed exceedingly weak to me.