A letter from the exonerated man with more details: http://justicedenied.org/issue/issue_27/thomas_r_james.html
I wonder how the defense attorney feels about this. The July 2021 GQ article says "Chin, now retired, declined to answer questions for this article, citing client confidentiality."
I suppose Detective Conley has seen the news too? ("Detective Conley told me through an intermediary that he wasn't interested in talking, either. He wanted to enjoy his retirement.")
But on further reflection I guess those people … really don't matter? They're no longer working, they can't hurt anyone else. What is Mr. James going to do now?
That’s the real crime, that he ruined at least one man’s life but still gets to “enjoy retirement”. And I bet he sleeps like a baby.
But yes. For a mistake in which all(!) parts of the system have completely failed, for that then the pawn is to be punished.
In a time of cancel culture, mobs on the net, cyber bullying and death threats by idiots online, I wouldn't talk to a reporter either.
At least that's how I can imagine the thought process. And there may be another aspect. I don't know, but my pop culture "education" would make me fear that I might expose myself to the risk of a lawsuit for damages if I were to admit a mistake instead of the police officer.
Because in my opinion he is not to blame. But he does bear part of the responsibility. And he should own up to it. Unquestioningly. But I know too little whether he would make himself personally vulnerable.
In this respect I would not go from the refusal to comment on the case to deny him the enjoyment of the pension.
I think the issue is the contrast between having ruined someone’s life and the “fuck off and let me enjoy myself” reply. And the utter lack of empathy this betrays. A simple acknowledgment and possibly an apology for having caused so much hurt would have gone a long way.
People online are brutal. It's better not to engage at all.
>He wasn't interested in talking, either. He wanted to enjoy his retirement.
and
>He wasn't interested in talking, either but feels sorry for what happened.
We have exactly one piece of evidence to the quality of his work and it's that the quality of his work is garbage. Why would you assume this?
Another option is to punish all of those involved.
It should not have taken months to see that the original conviction was flawed, so I suspect this is a paraphrase for the state attorney holding her ground until the evidence against her position was overwhelming. Once reasonable doubt has been established, continued incarceration begins to look increasingly like a kidnapping, the longer it goes on. Where is the justice in that?
Of course they matter. They're reflections of the entire system they existed in. There are a lot of Detective Conleys out there, and Detective Conley probably mentored at least a few of them. The same goes for the prosecutor.
The question isn't how do we deal with them, the question is how we change the system to stop manufacturing people like them and then giving them the power to do these things.
Have to wonder how many innocent people have been executed.
/Facepalm