I flagged it because it appears to be written to mostly elicit outrage, as opposed to informing the reader.

For example the headline "Mom smokes, so it's probably okay" and then 8 paragraphs of lead-up to the argument that the Go standard library has an inelegant IP type. Afterwards the author equates people using custom types to "build a whole new type system".

"Evidently, the Go team didn't want to design a language." is also pretty insulting if you consider how much the Go team wrote and talked about why they designed things in this way.

And to make a lot of weird arguments work, the author then refuses to treat any cgo feature as part of the Go language ecosystem. That's the point where I was convinced that the author wrote the summary before researching the arguments.