This shouldn't be flagged...
For example the headline "Mom smokes, so it's probably okay" and then 8 paragraphs of lead-up to the argument that the Go standard library has an inelegant IP type. Afterwards the author equates people using custom types to "build a whole new type system".
"Evidently, the Go team didn't want to design a language." is also pretty insulting if you consider how much the Go team wrote and talked about why they designed things in this way.
And to make a lot of weird arguments work, the author then refuses to treat any cgo feature as part of the Go language ecosystem. That's the point where I was convinced that the author wrote the summary before researching the arguments.
It immediately follows up with interesting discussion about how it's acceptable for a team of experts to use Go. I think he's wrong, Go is perfectly powerful in the hands of novices. And I actually think a team of experts like Tailscale would probably be much better served by choosing Rust.
But that's all besides the point. The article is excellent, fits our forum and is a great basis for discussion. You are not using the flagging feature as it's intended to be used.