Several good points above.
Don't forget about the captive audience in airports, too. That kept CNN artificially in the public eye.
Don't forget about the captive audience in airports, too. That kept CNN artificially in the public eye.
Zucker rationalized the decision by blaming streaming services and other mobile media but I don't buy that because Airport was still invasive - i.e., people look up from their devices and could still be seeing CNN, etc. today. And, from a business perspective, it required very few internal technical resources (a single master control system and operator) so the costs were almost certainly exclusive to whatever fees CNN paid to airports to install their receivers and displays.
(Full disclosure: I'm a former operations-level CNN employee, half speculating from my time at CNN WHQ)