I'm a proponent of weakening net neutrality for when lives are at stake, but that's hardly ever the case on the internet. The problem is that most non-neutral treatment is the result of business interests rather than the greater good.
> 3103. (a) Nothing in this title supersedes any obligation or authorization a fixed or mobile Internet service provider may have to address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety, or national security authorities, consistent with or as permitted by applicable law, or limits the provider’s ability to do so.
[0] https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml...
How is that not similar to ISPs throttling?
Not that I care much either way. I care more about localities and states encouraging or enforcing monopolies.
The toll road doesn’t forbid trucks or cars painted red just because traffic on the toll road is heavy. Paying for the size of your vehicle isn’t like throttling; it’s like paying different amounts for different bandwidths.
It’d only be similar to throttling if the toll roads charged different amounts based on the contents of the vehicles.