Hacker News Reader

> In short, Twitter is not keeping up with the broader economy at Musk's price. You're telling the investment banks, mutual funds, and most-senior vested employees that their company has the same worth as a low-risk government bond or a bar of metal.

Exactly! The stock has been a terrible investment since IPO, and Twitter management has done a terrible job of unlocking value. It's current management that has failed to keep up with the broader economy. Musk thinks he can do a lot better if he has full control. Musk's price is a reflection of how poorly current management has done; he is not trying to compensate you for future growth.

If you think current management can drive the share price much higher, then you should not sell to Musk. If you think current management is just going to be more of the same, Musk is giving you a big premium over where the stock had been trading, and you should take his offer.

If Musk thinks Twitter will be worth $400 in five years' time, then he can realize that value for himself. He'd be very foolish to offer you that price now.

View on HN

- Horrendous UX (Why can't I see the context of a tweet?) - Seemingly crappy bot policing (Really? You, "Megan, Warrior, mother, wife, respect all animals, bless our troops, go cowboys [football][usaflag][fingerhorns]" really have 4138 followers and 4087 followed? Plus, the first follower I click has the same corny bio style, 4112 followers and 4056 followed, and only retweets political tweets?) - Creates aggressive echo chambers and lopsided arguments. (Influential user blasts another, their army of followers comment and like each others comments, blasted user's entire dialogue gets buried under army's despite having valid arguments.) - I'm sick of seeing the thoughts of politicians and celebrities.