> 54 metres (177 ft) high and 48 metres (157 ft) wide > more than 2,500 h/year [sunlight] > peak power of 3200 kW > Temperatures above 2,500 °C (4,530 °F)
Sounds like it could be useful as a "default load" inside an otherwise inactive solar furnace at least.
Photovoltaics just turn solar energy into electricity, and don't need the heat engine. This has made them way cheaper to deploy than solar thermal energy. So unless there's something very important about this new TEG, the solar thermal vs photovoltaic calculus doesn't really change.
I assume that means there could be room to significantly improve its efficiency or operating requirements with more investment and research.
Having one example, even if 'useless' or elementary, is key to developing new technology.
1. Multistage (moderate to high pressure ratio) steam turbines have thermodynamic efficiencies that vary from 65 percent for very small (under 1,000 kW) units to over 90 percent for large industrial and utility sized units.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/ca...
But this title would not be correct.
Methane combusts at 1,957 °C, right in the band for this thermal cell, and is a normal heat source for steam power.
The steam doesn't reach this temperature, of course, but nor does it need to.