Let me summarize the press release for you: "We will talk about it internally in the political party".
In other words, the submitted article is just bullshit.
In other words, the submitted article is just bullshit.
There's an article in the most-respected British newspaper, articles in English-language Swedish newspapers and an original press release providing a primary source for part of the news (I assume there were interviews or similar as it was announced).
> The Social Democrat general secretary, Tobias Baudin, said the security review would be complete “before the summer”.
(From another article as I'm not a Times subscriber.)
If you won't believe quotes from senior politicians in major newspapers I can't help you.
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/s-drar-i-gang-natodebatt-...
Nothing is decided yet, and although it is a lot more likely to happen now than a week ago the foreign sources make it sound like a decision has been made. If that was the case it would be headline news in all the swedish newspapers.
I read an article a few months back about a Swedish town that prepares itself as a place for storing nuclear waste for the next 10000 years. The one thing I remember from that article is that it took 18 years to start building the facility. I get that desperate times and so on, but I think deciding something huge on a timeline this tight is not very probable.
EDIT: actually, storage meant for 100_000 years! Here: https://www.dw.com/en/sweden-approves-plans-for-forsmark-nuc...
I would be very careful making statements like this as if you knew how to interpret that quote from that exact person and party he represents.