As somebody else said in this thread, it's really rich to see Paul write about "implicitly ending the discussion" when he instablocks anybody on Twitter so easily.
Misquote. He said "implicitly ending the discussion by calling someone a x-ist", which is not the same at blocking someone who is annoying - blocking someone is just shutting your door, not making them lose their livelihood by defaming them.
If you know of any instance where someone has lost their livelihood due _only_ to being called an x-ist, please share.
This is hardly implicit.
Edit: and now it’s flagged.
Also, you want to write software without “being canceled?” Well, dust off your oscilloscope skills, in the unglamorous embedded world I hear toned down right wing rants about Putin being canceled and Covid testing as a mass surveillance program and all that happens is sometimes someone’s like, alright, let’s move the meeting along.
Does PG live in the Bay Area? That’s probably why. Most mainstream American opinions would get a person fired there.
Holding a view that tens of millions of Americans have and you get fired.
It's not even particularly controversial.