And they will tell higher up "everything is going to according to plan."
All things considered not the best situation to be in, because getting rid of the zero-covid strategy right now will cause lots and lots of deaths. Maybe China should have done as the rest of the world has done when it came to Covid and it should have tried to adjust gradually, as the pandemic progressed.
SH's fault is not CN's fault. China has no face, we just have the biggest slient most, pardon my English if you may ;)
silent majority?
You see, if you pardon my jibber jabber, 'most' is statistic but 'majority' implies some political asset..
> I mean didn't sputnik at least prove somewhat effective?
Sputnik V was one of the most effective vaccines. It was more effective than J&J and AstraZeneca in phase-3 trials.
> they probably have the money to just buy the rights to produce it
A Chinese company, Fosun, invested in the development of the BioNTech vaccine early on, and has the rights to produce and distribute it in China. The vaccine hasn't been approved in mainland China, though.
The efficacy of Chinese vaccines isn't a major issue. They're plenty effective, and 3 doses of Sinovac actually turned out to be just as effective as 3 doses of BioNTech in Hong Kong.[1]
The issue is that old people in China have been hesitant to get vaccinated at all. So far, old people in China have been protected by the zero-CoVID policy, so this hasn't been an issue. If the virus starts spreading, however, it will become an issue.
1. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.22.22272769v...
In Hong Kong, 3 doses of Sinovac turned out to be just as effective (in fact, slightly more effective, though that could be statistical noise) as 3 doses of BioNTech.[1]
Yet the idea that Chinese vaccines don't work is incredibly widespread in the West. It's pure prejudice, in my opinion.
1. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.22.22272769v...