He's also agreed to never own more than 14%, so effectively agreeing only to be a voice, not a wrecking ball.
That's just a going rule but I just checked. 80% of twitter is held by institutions. Only 2.5% is owned by insiders.
No dorsey to be seen here? No elliot management? https://www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2020/02/29/twitters-...
Unless I'm missing something... Elon owns Twitter. This was a super easy hostile takeover... he doesn't need 14%
Elon probably doesnt want any sort of key position because afterall he's in constant fight over tesla and sec.
De voormalige eigenaar en mede-oprichter Jack Dorsey bezit 2,25 procent van de aandelen. [1]
[1] https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2022/04/04/elon-musk-koopt-aandele...
Twitter will get more attention for sure, but possibly not the kind of attention they want. But apparently there's no such thing as bad publicity.
I think of of the interesting things to watch for is if he starts pressuring for the guy who tracks the movements of his private jet to have his account terminated.
Ok, a few guys had a buissness plan and then used Musk money to totally run the buissness into the ground.
Tesla without Musk is just another footnote in the histoy of EV.
If you ignore the 89 deaths from Toyota vehicle acceleration issues, 271 deaths from Ford's faulty tires in the 90s, 303 dead from GM's faulty ignition switches, 478 deaths from Fiat's engines exploding, and 823 deaths from Ford's Bronco tipping over at speeds as slow as 20MPH.