You don’t like my “lecturing,” but you continue making preposterous statements and asking questions that can’t be answered without “lecturing.” It’s like you’re saying “why is the sky is blue when we have water?” and then correcting yourself with “but I was talking about the stars, dude. ;)”
To answer pragmatically:
- don’t use the style attribute
- you could use XLST, which is style (and more) that uses the same ML
- are you suggesting that CSS and HTML should have the same style? <a style=“color=\”red\””>? I don’t know how that’s better.
Maybe you’re still missing some lecturing: HTML is content and CSS is style. What you’re saying about 3D context would be specified in CSS, in a separate file, so your CSS-in-HTML readability argument (I guess that’s your argument? Who knows) falls pretty flat.
It’s almost the same as complaining that JS doesn’t have the same format as HTML while it totally could, but instead we have JS-in-HTML. Oh how unfair life is.
As far as I can see, you’re just trolling, so thanks for the laughs.
Signed,
<a onclick="this.style.background='url(<svg title=\"🖕\"><rect fill=\"blue\"/></svg>)'">