Hacker News Reader

It's a bad sign that I can't tell if someone spent a lot of time on an elaborate April's Fool joke or if it's a serious C++ proposal.

It's a bad sign in general that adding long-needed safeguards to C++ can be considered a joke.

C++ should double down on high performance. Better support for inline assembly. More parallelism and concurrency. Specialization.

Performance without safety sounds to me like "I'm doing the wrong thing, but faster!"

Where we’re going we won’t need the right thing.

can't do that without these safeguards...