Lovely little example of a completely meaningless statement that sounds good only superficially. Since they can always claim that "minimum amount" required includes nearly anything they can grab about users or non-users because "engagement" or whatever technical argument they decide to shit out, any quantity of data vampirism can be perfectly justified by the internal logic of their claim.

I suppose this is just the strategy now with the re-branding. Facebook stole as much data as possible but at Meta a core principle has always been to steal as little data as we possible can. If we say it enough times then it must be true.

I'm sure they actually do consider data minimization, but only when data collection stands in the way of getting users into the product.

They don't say just how much data that is...so it isn't the biggest lie facebook has told.