Hacker News Reader

The two are not incompatible. Sure, most people are better off using off-the-shelf crypto or chemistry instead of rolling their own.

But as a society, we stand to benefit from educating people. Someone has to actually build the off-the-shelf crypto, right? So if strictly everybody is told "nah, don't roll your own", who's going to advance the field?

My point is that we should facilitate people understanding things. Sure, this may push some people to figure "meh, I know everything, let me just roll my own" and proceed to build something buggy. But that happens anyway.

> Yes people need to know "how to make smart crypto decisions", but when you are dealing with sysadmins or other end-users, I put it to you that they could not care less about the mathematical theory, what they really want/need to know is "what settings should I be using with $insert_name_of_crypto_library in my config file".

I'm a sysadmin and very much like to know how the things I deploy and manage work, so I can make decisions about things. That doesn't mean I'm out here writing my own OS or anything.

Also, I think being educated allows people to be less susceptible to snake-oil salesmen and the like.

A good current-day example is the debate about cryptography backdoors. Maybe if more people understood how things worked, they wouldn't keep parroting the line of "nothing to hide [from the government]", because they'd understand that bad guys are extremely likely to have that very same access.

>because they'd understand that bad guys are extremely likely to have that very same access.

Despite access being available most "bad guys" / people wanting to talk to one use popular platforms just like "good guys." Big platforms are typically easier to use and have a lot of other people already on it. It's not about what people have access to, it is what people use.

Hi. Can I just say that you both are right and I find myself agreeing with both of you? Thank you.

> But as a society, we stand to benefit from educating people. Someone has to actually build the off-the-shelf crypto, right? So if strictly everybody is told "nah, don't roll your own", who's going to advance the field?

I'm sorry but I don't buy that argument.

The main problem with that line of argument is where do you stop.

I mean sure, its great to "educate people" but in the end each person only has so many hours in the day. They also have other constraints on their time (jobs, families etc.).

If we take your argument to its logical conclusion then you will tell me that I cannot consider visiting a Chinese Restaurant unless I have educated myself by learning Chinese and the intricacies of Chinese cuisine and cooking techniques so then I can make "smart decisions" about what I eat for dinner when all I really want is some roast duck and some steamed prawn dumplings ?

Sheesh.

That's really not my argument.

I'm not talking about forcing education on anyone, and preventing them from doing things if they're uneducated.

Rather, I'm all for making education easily available. Sure, if you want to roll your own crypto or go to a Chinese restaurant without learning about those things, go ahead. I have absolutely no problem with that.

My point is that education about those (and really, any) topics shouldn't be hard to come by if you're interested.

That doesn't mean that you should have to pass a Chinese culture exam in order to be allowed in a restaurant.

But if you're curious about Chinese cuisine, it's better if you don't have to jump through hoops to learn about it, or have to visit 10000 restaurants for 10 years, so you can learn about it through "trial and error".

---

edit:

The specific line your first comment cited from its parent is, emphasis mine:

>> people have said "don't roll your own crypto" - but really, that's stupid. What we need is accessible information to explain cryptography to people, so they know how to make smart crypto decisions

This is what I'm replying to. Easy access doesn't mean forcing anyone to learn anything.

then we would have to teach the world basic chemistry

When I was in high school, they did. Is that not the case anymore?

It is still taught from a chemical standpoint, but the second and third order consequences of ingestion are not really addressed. You might get a generic disclaimer somewhere saying "harmful to humans" here and there.

This isn't forcing people to learn crypto, it's providing resources so that they can. Obviously it's simpler to use crypto libraries.