I do. When my fingers are resting on a laptop keyboard (actually any not-split keyboard), left pinky is on `q` and left index is on `v`, right index rests on `n`, right pinky between `;`, `p` and `[`. This is much closer to a neutral wrist position, and I curl my fingers while extending the index fingers to place all eight on the home keys. Left thumb is higher than the right, to hit the space bar.
I hit the touch bar by accident most frequently when typing parentheses, since I try not to twist my wrists at all, so I'm curling my left pinky for Shift and moving my whole palm up very slightly for the 9 key, or doing a weird chord for Shift-0 all on the right hand (a habit I'm trying to train myself out of, along with a few stubborn glyph sequences where I type 'y' with my left index).
I'm on the last Intel touchbar-having MacBook I'll ever own, and vowed to never own two of the butterfly keyboards, which they fixed before I left the platform, so Apple is fixing its mistakes juuuust fast enough to not lose me. The only people I've ever heard speak up for the Touch Bar do a lot of photo editing while traveling.
Added: the biggest failure of the touch bar wasn't accidental presses, but the lack of a haptic engine to confirm that it recognizes presses. In fact I'm sure this would reduce accidental hits, because fingers are very sensitive and need that kind of feedback to know they've moved wrong. When I hit play accidentally going for a ), which is The Worst, it's several keystrokes later that my brain realizes I triggered a 'button'.
Conversely, when I am trying to interact with the damned thing, I have to give it my undivided visual attention, and I'm often trying to look at something my own finger is occluding for feedback.
Haptic engine. How did this product ever ship without a Taptic™ engine. Apple makes the best haptic feedback in existence! Make sure you've worn the Watch for at least a week if you want to debate this. I'll never understand that decision, and we'll never know if the touch bar could have worked.