But where did I exactly say 'ban' it?
Or that tor itself is the road to hell?
Either way, your same argument can be made against the whole internet which should demonstrate how silly it is.
Not really.
I recognize that the same criminals can also use the wider internet too, however there are central authorities and regulators in different countries that have laws that regulate the internet in the countries that they are in and these criminals will be caught very quickly if they tried.
The difference is that Tor only makes it more harder to trace, hence the appeal to criminals, extremists and terrorists to use it for their illegal activities which that is its unintended use case after promising 'privacy' and 'anonymity' for 'everyone'.
So yes, that is it's 'decentralised' road to hell indeed.
[0] https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/08/349016/a-dark-we...
[1] https://www.computerworld.com/article/2845616/biggest-ever-t...
Am I? Or didn't I just say 'There's just too many to list here' and just listed the notable examples.
> The people operating darknet markets are not Nazis, extremists, and generally not hitmen and terrorists.
So who operated those Tor nodes and services of multiple darknet websites in [0] and [1]? Another cybercriminal.
> I've never looked for reliable citations or personally verified.
Talking about 'movings goal posts' and missing the whole 'anonymity' point of Tor. Only time will tell, but so far a great use case for criminals, extremists and terrorists using it.
[0] https://www.nbcnews.com/technolog/how-anonymous-tor-users-co...
[1] https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/08/349016/a-dark-we...