Your comment is actually an amazing example of why we should absolutely avoid media censorship (like the EU is doing right now); it seems like the people who are usually the most vocally pushing for it are also, not coincidentally, those who are also the most likely to be completely oblivious to propaganda even when it's right in front of them. Yet also think that they are impervious to it.
They generally do not consider it unbiased at all and many would call it false propaganda, especially if they are Irish or Scottish.
If there were an option to pay the license fee from the US, I would.
I can’t decide your generalizations are pretty ignorant (at best parroting the Daily Mail and friends) or malevolent.
Hyperbolic claim, so I will ignore it.
>it is generally more free of bias than any other available source, especially when covering international matters.
I disagree, especially when the British have an interest in the outcome of an international situation.