The only truth here is that Russia invaded Ukraine, and without the invasion this destruction would not have taken place. Russia brought the war, and now are acting as "well it's your fault for resisting, why can't you just bend over and take it".

This is the incovenient truth. dang, can we please ban in this account that spews propaganda ?

It's absolutely irrelevant which side's shell ultimately reached the plane. The only thing that matters in this context is that it was destroyed during Russian unprovoked invasion.

Even if that were true, which I doubt, who is at fault? Could it possibly be Russia for, I don't know, launching a full scale invasion? :)

There's a claim being made without sources, of course there's going to be some skepticism.

Instead of going "this is LITERALLY 1984", why not provide a source yourself to back it up? You're being defensive and going ad hominem, claiming oppression and censorship instead of supporting a claim which should take ten seconds of googling.

I did that, can't find a source. If you can find evidence that the Ukranians destroyed it themselves and it's being censored, then come back to this comment section. Until then, probably better for everyone's sanity to accept the limited information as true for now.

Ukraine says the An-225 was destroyed on the 26th. And their artillery strike came on the 27th.

With the fog of war, it's impossible to say with full certainty who destroyed the plane. And the whole war is the fault of Russia.

In the meantime, feel free to shove the "inconvenient truth i just came up with and claim is fact being flagged" bullshit up your arse.

Thats not a fact check. You provide no source at all. How do you get your information? Russia Today or the Telegram channels they've infiltrated?

You made two statements contradicting all reporting made outside of Russia. There's nothing to substantiate it as truth, including your link, which says nothing of the kind.