Hacker News Reader

For a while, I was wondering why Nutella, a chocolate spread, had anything to do with this!

Auto-correct

So it's supposed to be Nadella?

Guess that makes more sense, I initially thought it was a comment on Nestle somehow.

There are a lot of similarities between Nestle and Microsoft ( both have revolving doors with governments for example).

You and I seem to have wildly different definitions of what passes for chocolate.

May I suggest trying actual hazelnut tahini instead of the sugar blasted paste with only trace amounts of the good stuff in it.

The lesson here seems to be: don't mess with people's sugar

Where does it say that I eat Nutella?

The consumer side i don't know but on the developer front they're doing pretty nice.. vscode is wildly used (and appreciated), .net is growing ok, typescript too. The github thing didn't turn out sour yet.

The next 10 years will be weird and critical because most new people on earth will be born outside of the windows ruling days. I think they're gonna pull the rug hard on any fat application ala MS/Office because it will be completely aberrant to "work" this way when everything you used since birth was a few swipe away.

Going after developers with excellent tooling has been part of the MS strategy since at least the 90s. MS knows that they need lots of 3rd party developers to make their own offerings more successful and that's why they're throwing them bones. They are still trying to lock users into MS products and services. It's always been a mix of direct and indirect vendor lock in - for example, proprietary data formats or no equivalent application/extension for competing product/OS.

I meant mostly that MS managed to revive its brand on this front. It was a secondary name after Apple / Google became flagships. I consider that a very harduous task. A lot of company could have shriveled and die a slow death.

Why is this shocking ? They are copying macOS where this feature is already present. When Apple does it, it's just perfectly fine and (in Apple fan voice) - this so significantly improves the UX experience.

But, when Microsoft does it, OMG the SUN is FALLING.

I'll play devil's advocate and suggest that when one buys a Mac, one is already aware of the fact that it's more of an appliance and a subscription hub than an actual computer. Yes, it does all the regular computer things, but it's practically a loss-leader for Apple to keep you in the ecosystem (and I say this as someone who "owns" a M1 mini).

For Microsoft on the other hand, this is breaking new ground with Windows users. Microsoft has slowly been easing their users into a OS-as-a-Service paradigm, the next logical step for them is to require your credit card info (which to be clear, isn't required...yet) to continue to use the OS on the computer you bought outright. After all, the other major software players are pushing subscriptions instead of license purchases (Adobe, Parallels, Codeweavers, and Microsoft themselves with 365, among so many others), so why not charge a fee to use their preloaded and -- in the eyes of the average consumer -- required OS?

>it's practically a loss-leader for Apple

Apple isn't selling its hardware at a loss, it is well known for the very high margins on hardware.

This is a feature of macOS that I have always resented. The fact that win11 is doing it too just pushes me further into the linux camp.

I've got an install of windows 10 I use for gaming, and am now very glad I didn't upgrade to 11 yet. I'll probably avoid it as long as possible.

Have you been dual-booting? What's your experience been like, generally? I built my current desktop something like 5+ years ago, and have been thinking about building something new, with Windows kept as a second fiddle for when the few games I still play don't cooperate on WINE or Proton.

I've always kept a windows partition around, just in case things go sideways and for gaming. Proton is great, but not good enough for many games.

Dual booting can have odd effects on Windows. The strangest I have encountered is that windows shuts down when it thinks it is rebooting, and reboots when I tell it to shut down.

Other than that, no issues, though I always make sure when installing linux that I have Windows totally up to date (some mostly for firmware updates).

Manjaro and Pop_OS! are a breeze to install- resizing the windows partition is as easy as dragging a slider. It has been awhile since I have used something else, but I imagine any distro with a modern kernel and gui installer will be easy enough.

In fact, I recently picked up an lg gram (16")- some occasional graphical glitching I am blaming on wayland, but other than that, the hardware actually works better on linux than windows.

Thanks for the tips! As for Windows acting strange, I've heard that it can have something to do with 'fast boot' settings on the motherboard BIOS. Not sure if you've checked that already.

Have you ever seen Windows muck up the bootloader? I remember grumblings from some time ago, where it would cause grub to malfunction by making certain assumptions about the disk it was on.

I've not experienced grub issues personally in recent memory, to be honest- at least, none caused by windows.

I turned off fast boot when I set up the problematic machine, but on my newest machine (LG gram) I didn't bother and it is working fine.

> Dual booting can have odd effects on Windows. The strangest I have encountered is that windows shuts down when it thinks it is rebooting, and reboots when I tell it to shut down.

That is because it is not shutting down. Go in (power) settings and change the settings to always do a shutdown when you shutdown ( default is to hibernate) and disable fast reboots.

I think maybe you misunderstood what I was getting at.

When windows reboots during an update process, it says "rebooting" on the screen but actually powers off. Same goes for clicking "reboot" in the start menu.

When clicking "shut down", the screen displays the "shutting down" message, but it actually reboots the computer back to the OS selection screen.

Neither scenario goes into hibernate.

Fair enough. I suspect many users likely asked for this feature in the feedback hub and MS complied.

If there is one thing I have learned MS does not listen to ANYTHING important or critical to the users in the feedback hub.

But of course they listen. The only issue is that the answer is always: scan for viruses and run Fixme.

I was thinking the same thing. Having payment info built into the os makes a lot of sense for my usage patterns. I like Apple Pay and I think that if ms does it well, this is a plus, not a minus, and I didn’t see any red flags in this article but maybe I missed something?

Lol why is this downvoted so much? Do people get salty just at the mention of comparison with Apple?

Talk about a smarmy comment.

It's about HOW something like this is implemented.

Do I need to provide my CC info to set up a new mac user account? Fuck no you don't.

Where does it say that you need to provide CC info to setup a new user account? All I see in the article is that you can now add CC info in the user settings.

I clearly misinterpreted, so I retract. Use case does indeed seem pretty fair for people are are super bought into the MS ecosystem, I found it very frustrating how many places I had to log into windows 11 to get a new pc setup and running and this feels like a step in the right direction.

Unfortunately, besides Office, my employer still has a much longer list of desktop and web applications that only work with Windows and Windows-only software (e.g. Internet Explorer). The most prominent obstacle is Acrobat, as we use fillable PDFs with smartcard digital signatures for all of our internal paperwork. Adobe stopped supporting Acrobat for Linux around 2013. I can't even view a lot of our PDFs with the alternative viewers, let alone fill and sign them.

Anyway, I agree to your point about Microsoft turning my opinion against them with all these things about Windows 11. I used Windows 10 at home quite happily from 2017-2021, and I even praised the new Chromium-based Edge to my friends and coworkers. I switched back to Linux when I got a new laptop in October, and I feel like I got out of the Microsoft ecosystem at the right time. I still need a Windows 10 virtual machine on-hand for occasional work-from-home tasks, though.

I worked part-time at a gas station many years ago. When the chores were done, I'd often be reading the newspapers, or straightening things out, and I'd inevitably end up reading the labels of snacks and drinks and such. Eventually, I'd end up reading all of the asterisk'ed statements on the junk food, and it left me with a severe distaste for 'marketing speak', as well as how less-than-honest some of the labels were. This distaste carried over from snack food products to just about all consumer goods.

Windows 8 forced defaults that people didn't like on desktops. You could fix this relatively quickly, but my issue is the principle of MS assuming that MS knows better than their users. Otherwise, I was a fan, so long as I could use educational licenses for free.

Windows 10 was kinda nice, but is (imo) roughly when MS decided that they should force their ways on people. No matter what settings I provided to their update service, it would inevitably decide that I must update and restart when I was trying to use my damn machine. Multiple times in college, I'd get up from what I was working on to do some little 15-minute task, and find that Windows had shut down and was in the process of updating. After the second time I lost work, I made some registry edits to block the auto-install and auto-restart. Updates would get run at my convenience, finally.

Microsoft managed to make updates easy, and then painful again.

Around that same time, it felt like the 'marketing speak' was starting to talk down to me, infiltrating dialog boxes, and implying that Microsoft knew better than I did as to how I should be using my machine. When once dialogs were simply informational, they were now suggestive and intrusive, and groan-inducing. It's only gotten worse, and more pervasive.

I updated my PC a few times when trying to get Elden ring to work last week, and ran into the infamous full-screen not-normally-closable Edge advertisement. The 'close' button was disabled, rightclick in taskbar->close did nothing, and the ONE option available was to click 'Get Started', implying that I as a user agree with this all in some way. Instead, I killed the window via task manager, and decided that my next desktop PC will be linux-first, with a locked-down Windows partition for when cross-compat isn't available for my use cases.

I view an OS as a piece of software that allows me to make use of the hardware in my PC, and not as a service. Cue me, some years ago setting up something for Windows, and being told by the installer that "Windows is a Service". Bullshit!

> my issue is the principle of MS assuming that MS knows better than their users.

Web devs do this too when they decide to change scrolling behavior. One website I went to decided that 1 click should be half a line of scrolling and override my 1 click = 2 lines behavior. I'm just trying to figure out what would possibly make a web dev think overriding a user-defined setting with the dev's own personal preference is a feature. They had to go out of their way to spend time to develop that, which made me spend time figuring out exactly which JavaScript file to block with to prevent that from happening again.

> [win 10 forced updates]

Aggravating indeed, but I don't think Microsoft is entirely to blame. There are plenty of users that would just never update their systems if it wasn't forced. How many XP machines were vulnerable to MS08-067 for YEARS after a patch was available?

But yeah...I planned on doing a CPU-Mobo-RAM trifecta upgrade next year, along with a new NVMe drive, and take that time to upgrade to Windows 11, but the more I hear about it, the more I think I should just stick with 10. After tweaking, it behaves well enough. Win11 just doubles-down on dark patterns and anti-consumer bullshit. I'd switch to Linux in a heartbeat if all my games worked on it.

> Web devs

My big gripe with websites is when they break my standard 'flow' of opening links in a new tab to view later, or my 'flow' of web use in general. For years upon years, I'm taught by experience that clicking a link should either replace my current window or open a new one, and that middle-clicking will ignore that, opening the linked content in a separate tab.

Great! I can do a (cognitive) lazy-load and effectively finish my first train of thought before further narrowing my field of focus.

Now, when searching on Google Maps for restaurants in an area (and plenty of other sites for other purposes), middle click does nothing (aside from engaging the scroll thing that I never use). I must follow Google's flow of clicking, being taken to a new tab, and returning to my original one in order to complete my original task, since I also can't just rightclick->open in new tab.

All this, on an element that is made to look like a hyperlink, but not actually act like one. It's just some cheap-feeling .js SPA that acts more like an app than a website, which makes me do extra work to accomplish a given task.

> Updates

I totally understand wanting security patches to be made available at high speed and wide breadth, and if Windows Update spun off security updates into some sort of module for Windows Defender, I'd be much more willing to accept the nags to update. However, I don't think it's in MS's interest to do so, as that would mean less auto-installed telemetry, and less MS-beneficial default settings being auto-applied or re-applied upon update, less people 'accidentally' defaulted back to Edge and Bing.

We're also in a different internet ecosystem than the XP days. Software is often built to expect constant connectivity, or be entirely reliant on it.

A somewhat relevant example is how PC versions of Call of Duty dropped support for dedicated servers after Modern Warfare (One or two more releases had dedicated servers, but I can't be bothered to remember which). My clan from those days ran a Hardcore-mode Search and Destroy server, and we were able to form and govern our own community, because we effectively 'owned' an instance of the game server, and had control over it.

Nowadays, you hit quick-play, drop in, and everyone is just as unimportant and anonymous as the next person. When the main servers are offline, so are you, because the lobbies are yet-another-instance of some VM or server software hosted in the cloud by the company. The game exists as a 'Live Service', which just means that they're going to drip out some purchasable content and 'season passes' for bundles of the dripped content.

I'll be rebuilding pretty much my whole PC in the next 2 or 3 years, since everything in it is getting old (and a GTX 1080 isn't as good as it used to be), and Linux will be my main OS since I play much fewer games anyways. Windows will be for when I just need DirectX and whatever proprietary DRM/Anticheat spyware for my software to be usable, and I'll practice ripping out telemetry from the OS when I get bored.

I like SPAs when they're done right.

Google Maps has some hiccups, but overall I like the way it works. Did you ever use MapQuest in the early '00s? Having to do a full page load to move your view was awful

I've considered running Windows only as a shell for running a Linux VM (that I would actually do my daily driving in) and Windows-only games, but I don't know how well that would work. How good is GPU acceleration in a VM is you're not using PCI-E pass-through? I'd also worry about the RAM requirements to make that work well, as I'd effectively be splitting my RAM in half, though I was planning on going to 64 GB on my next upgrade anyways.

Key phrase, "when they're done right" :)

GMaps is good when I'm using it for navigation, but exploration is clearly not its intent, which is probably why I take so much issue with it. My utility company seems to use an SPA for their portal, and I've never had an issue with it, since everything I need it to do is readily accessible.

I've yet to try setting up GPU or PCIe passthrough, but I imagine that they wouldn't take up too much overhead on their own. It isn't 1:1 comparable to your situation, but Linus Tech Tips has a few videos titled something like "X gamers on 1 machine", which shows it's doable.

Having a guest OS in a VM would likely be the bigger performance bottleneck (with extra input lag), and I'm pretty sure that some anticheat software detects and discriminates against being run in a VM. I'd sooner try to get a game in a working state on the Linux OS with Proton or Wine, and drop down to installing on Windows if it fails or gets too fussy.

> I'm pretty sure that some anticheat software detects and discriminates against being run in a VM

I've always thought that the ability for a program to detect that it's in a VM is a failure of the hypervisor.

My main goal was really to just avoid having to reboot my system and switch to Windows any time I wanted to play a game that only worked in Windows.

It's hard to sell something that no one wants or needs, so the sales pitches become progressively stranger and more desperate.

IMHO, from a consumer POV, Win 95 and Win 7 are the high points in Microsoft's OS release history. Win 8 was horrendously bad. Win 10 is marginally worse than Win 7.

My 2021 Win 10 laptop keeps trying to convince me to upgrade to Win 11, although even a quick googling indicates that it is almost sure to slow down my AMD-based machine.

I don't want Win 11.

My AMD based laptop performs much better since upgrading to Windows 11.

My intel based laptop performs like crap in Win 10.

> For just one example, I was watching the trailer for the MSFS cloud service a few days ago, and the entire ad is just bullshit - nobody plays games like that, nobody sits like that, nobody holds their controller/device like that.

Anyone got a link? There are a ton of ads/trailers showing up in search but I can't find that one.

here ya go

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJvLzJgZo2o

Don't get me wrong - the game is beautiful, but so much about it - the way updates are handled, the lack of proper 'deep' add-on support, and the marketing - are done in a way that is frustrating to the point that many users give up, so poorly baked that large developers (PMDG) have had to spend years on something that should have probably taken 3-4 months (essentially porting their 737 from FSX/P3D), or cringeworthy, respectively. I get that Asobo is its own studio, and people might criticise me for taking some pretty specific criticisms and generalising them to the entire company, but from the interactions I have had with Microsoft - Xbox Live, Windows, Office 365, the office iPhone apps, Outlook, Edge - those sorts of issues - frustrating, half/poorly baked, and cringeworthy - are elements that absolutely permeate Microsoft's entire product line. There'd be a certain charm to it if it was just cringeworthy and noting else, but the fact is their incompetence (or whatever it is) makes life harder than it otherwise would be - and that's a big no from me.

I mean, as a random aside, I've been a huge Flight Sim fan since FS9, with tens of thousands of hours in FSX, XP11, and P3D. MSFS should be the final word, but the fact is I haven't touched it in months and I'm just looking forward to XP12, with graphics that are from 10 years ago but with a fucking developer platform, and a developer itself, that just seems to 'get it'. Microsoft doesn't.

Like I said, I'm not predicting their doom as a company, but I think it bodes ill for them in the longer term as developers and even some users gravitate towards entities that don't feel like they're constantly working against them in frustrating ways.

How has Microsoft torpedoed Edge?

Yep - there's shit like loan ads added to e-commerce web pages.

I was unaware about this feature. I have not seen it myself. Seems like a bizarre feature.

https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/articles/introducing-...

https://youtu.be/h34Oh8CEnqA

I don't know, without any details from him, I suspect parent is just trying to be edgy based on FUD he read online.

On my Win 11 laptop, Edge still gives me the best battery life to performance ratio vs chrome and Mozilla by a decent margin.

I don't get the Edge hate. I do hate Window 11 though.

Edge literally offers you loans when you are checking out on a website. How is that FUD or edginess? Sure, it can be better for battery life, but they still took a "clean slate" browser that started having a pretty good reputation after the chromium switch and began slowly filling it with cheap adware.

Plus, it's one of the browsers that has the most telemetry to the point where it sometimes can phone back everything you type to MS IIRC. So It's not "hate", they just don't like it for several good reasons

>Edge literally offers you loans when you are checking out on a website.

That literally never happened to me. Maybe because I'm in Europe.

I had switched to Edge for a year or two but was eventually pushed back to Chrome a few months ago because I got sick of how often they were shoving services I don't want to use in my face.

Plus it seems to have some kind of quality control issue. Pretty glaring bugs were making their way into the stable channel, and they wouldn't be fixed for far too long. There was a several week span (maybe even months?) where in Edge for Windows, clicking and dragging the scrollbar would make the scrollbar disappear and the entire web page would jut to the side. I don't recall ever having issues like that in Chrome, let alone as often as they happened on Edge.

And another minor niggling is the awkward update process on macOS. Chrome can just install updates in the background, then I click a button to restart the browser and the update is done. With Edge you have to do updates through their janky Microsoft updater application which you don't even install manually and can't seem to launch manually. It just appears when it wants to and then disappears again until the next time it decides to appear.

They don’t even sell windows 11 upgrade “lotto tickets” at retail stores anymore - why?

Just a quick question: do you currently use Windows 11, and for what?

I do, on my desktop for gaming. Nothing can compete with Windows for that yet, especially when you’re playing competitive multiplayer games with anti-cheat systems.

Have a MacBook that I use for everything else though.

And if you’re asking why 11 over 10, it’s mostly for the UI improvements. I quite enjoy their new look and haven’t really found any drawbacks with the update.

Work. I work mostly on the Microsoft stack, and I haven't broken the habit of Windows powershell to move to Powershell Core yet.

When I got upgraded to Win11 I first switched up the UI to look like Win10. I made a copy of System32 so I could keep the scant few things which were unusable in their W11 version (namely snipping tool).

It's basically Win10 more or less now. With some annoying regressions in how Explorer works. I won't enumerate them here.

Using it on my laptop for, whatever people use an OS for these days, like running apps on my laptop.

And we use it on the work laptops for development work.

Timing software for ski racing. DTris and Measures. Very niche and the tech stack for this product is 90's VBA I think.

" But it truly is fascinating to watch as a moderately tech savvy person - not sure I can remember anything like this where a tech company in a position where it has a lot of industry/programmer goodwill has inexplicably fucked over its developer-base so often in an 18-24 month period."

Then you haven't been paying attention to the last 23+ years of PC gaming, Microsoft and the game industry have been at war with the PC as an open platform once they discovered the average PC user was a moron and didn't understand that buy a client-server application for your PC (mmo's) is literally stealing software from yourself.

When richard garriot launched UO in 1997, the entire silicon valley business community was overjoyed. Garriot had done what other software companies failed to do, they literally got gamers to pay for the privilege of robbing themselves.

For those who don't know "MMO's" are a fake genre invented by the game industry to confuse the tech illiterate so they could monopolize their own products and prevent piracy (aka you can't really copy a game during its window if you don't have the server back end required for it to function).

They wanted to back end all the big budget games (aka steal them). So they needed a cover story to go along with it. Valve got the idea for steam from the success of Ultima online in 1997 and Everquest in 1999.

Everyone saw the sick money being made from stupid.

If you think "MMO's" are some special type of software, you're lacking basic computer literacy.

We've restored the networking code that was pulled out of need for speed world.

Here's an "MMO'" we've restored the networking code of, so no your whole post shows you don't grasp anything about how computers work. Any client server C++ application can be converted back to a local application (aka singleplayer+multiplayer PC game, no login accounts or user names /w server browser).

https://sites.google.com/site/djnfswo/

There are a few other "MMO's" which we've restored the networking code.

Up until the mid to late 90's EVERY PC GAME came with the ability to host your own multiplayer inside the game and quake 2 was already an "MMO" had limitless multiplayer.

John carmack (slightly paraphrasing) "No limit to the # of players..."

https://youtu.be/TfeSMaztDVc?t=100

For those of you who are shaking their heads, you can go view johns carmacks comment here saying quake 2 has limitless ("MMO") multiplayer, notice it didn't require giving up the game or carving back some of its code to lock the game down behind user accounts. They just wanted to get rid of the infinitely copyable binaries that most PC games were with Descent, doom, duke 3d, Unreal tournament, UT2003, UT2004.

How do you prevent cheating if everything is running on the client?

It’s probably propelled by the same management methodology Putin is using. Ass kissing and self congratulation.

I think its a combination of :

Lack of same market competition.

Captured audience/customers.

Azure/Office365 was genius, its going to keep them in the black for many years to come.

>> Azure/Office365 was genius, its going to keep them in the black for many years to come.

I'm sure that was planned similar to OneDrive, which is an utter piece of shit. I got a laptop at work with some hundreds of GB of storage. OneDrive was automatically backing everything up (I didn't ask it to). But then I ran out of free storage space on OneDrive, so I couldn't save files properly anymore until I did something about that. They wanted me to pay for more storage. Keep in mind I still had over 100GB free locally. I disabled OneDrive. All my files seemed to disappear. My options were to pay, or find where they were archived and pull them all out and put back where I wanted them (documents, desktop, etc...). It borders on ransomware, except you can get your stuff back if you pay attention and take a little time.

Most people don't actually want cloud computing. They do want cloud storage though. What we need is for Western Digital or similar to create a personal cloud storage system that you connect to your own network. (I've got many ideas around this, including backup, sharing, etc).

You mean like a NAS?

I've had a good experience putting a technologically inept client on a Synology. Their support which was pretty alright as well the couple times I had questions.

I wouldn't use that at home though. FreeNAS or Nextcloud on ZFS only, thanks.

What’s wrong with synology at home? Seems built for that, offering freenas features.

>> You mean like a NAS?

Sort of, but I think there is a lot more that can be done than just NAS.

They actually sell those. But they’re even more of a shit show.

>> But they’re even more of a shit show.

How so?

They still have no competition on the desktop. They can release me, vista, 8, 11... and still remain on top.

They will continue to behave this way until competition surges.

It's not unreasonable that this could happen. SteamDeck, a full Linux PC, has exceeded expectations and many parts of Linux that were seen lacking only 5 years ago have caught up dramatically.

This isn't to say that competition has surged already (it hasn't) but Windows isn't in the bulletproof fortress it was in in 2009.