Hacker News Reader

Comment by bombcar | Hacker News Reader

I wonder if prolonged experience with a written language that can condense quite well (and go in other directions that just left to right) is a factor.

I prefer old “data dump” websites even in English - much better than whatever the current “hero image” design we have now where we do about five words per ten inches it seems.

View on HN

Gosh I hate hero images so much. Wasting anywhere between 30%-100% of the above-the-fold space on an often completely meaningless stock photo or illustration with a loose connection to a keyword — who the fuck likes that?

Users do. I spent a whole summer A/B testing an app's landing page to get 10+% more conversions. Over 50 experiments, the biggest win was having a hero image. Its actual content didn't matter as long as it was a photo and featured humans. And the more screen space it took the better. Probably different for different markets and apps, but yeah from my experience users love em.

I'm talking about content websites, e.g. news sites, not marketing sites like app landing pages.

I don't see why it would be different. The only difference between anadvertising page and a news site nowadays is how quickly the hero image needs to change.

Reddit's old vs. current design is probably one of the biggest examples of the user philosophy changing overtime. Not really a "hero image", but the focus of presenting text with small thumbnails to huge thumbnails and a small header likely follows a similar philosophy.

I would assume the stats are basically the same, regardless of content, from experience with UX design and A/B testing these sorts of things.

I love hero images, but I get that on many sites it pushes the actual content below the fold, which isn't ideal.

I also find it easier to ctrl/cmd-f what I’m looking for on a data-dump page than try to parse their information architecture (navigation) or use the search box, which rarely seem to return useful results.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com