No, it's not: the point is that they're basically saying "we love it as long as it's someone else who loses potential profits, not us". This is kind of a significant, and not a semantic minor detail.

If one believes that open source something can lead to a loss of profits, then one must believe also that the open source software they have likely used has already made that sacrifice. It's easy to appreciate the sacrifice of others but then fail to make it oneself.

"We love all-you-can-eat buffets, just not the part where you pay for it (so we climb through the window of our local Golden Corral to make our getaway)"