From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30500697 it's clear that you actually could do this - why not write something about your experience? It would be interesting.
Meanwhile from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30501144 ("oh fuck off"), all we're going to get is a jammed discussion that's high on indignation and low on information. This doesn't do anyone any good, and it contributes to destroying this place, which is fragile (particularly right now).
The thing to understand is that discussions on a large, open forum like HN simply go straight to the toilet when people start telling each other to fuck off (and I'm not saying you weren't provoked). Smaller technical forums sometimes have a pugnacious culture that can survive this kind of thing and actually get more interesting as people challenge one another, etc., but all that goes out the window when the commenting population is as large as it is here. All it does is open the floodgates for the next round of comments which will be even more nasty and also don't actually know anything. This is not in any of our interests.
The rules on HN are designed to help interesting discussion survive such conditions. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking that to heart, we'd be grateful.
If anyone is interested in a more in-depth explanation, here is a long exchange I had with another user last year: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27161491. The point is that the rules on HN aren't trying to solve a moral problem (don't say bad things) but rather an optimization problem (how to sustain an internet forum that doesn't suck). I think that understanding this can make them seem less smarmy. At least I hope it can.