That's why we see so many smartphone recordings made by civilians, but not by the military.
That's why we see so many smartphone recordings made by civilians, but not by the military.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgd7dd/google-maps-live-traf...
Seems clear the policy and the reality are not identical here.
"The traffic jam slowly extended to the border, where it then disappeared."
https://www.the-sun.com/news/4757640/russian-soldiers-tinder...
"RUSSIAN soldiers began bombarding Ukraine yesterday — with Tinder messages looking for love."Broadsheets are physically bigger, more text, typically more serious, aiming at a more sophisticated reader
Tabloids physically smaller, more salacious, aiming at the mass market
(Many broadsheets became smaller to save printing costs over time, but the categories still apply)
That said, if they were posting on TikTok that's another story.
Yes they do, all the time. I don't think anyone left the wire without their phone while I was in Afghanistan.
And it's one thing to not expect the Taliban to DF your phones. The Ukrainian military, especially with prior control of the cell infrastructure, is another story.
Commercial telecommunications are an important part of any military worldwide, when they are available - so you use them until someone actually starts DFing you accurately, and then even after that, it's a risk to be managed and certainly not black & white.
So while yes, it is the smart thing to do it definitely isn't what happens in reality.
"Sir yes sir!"
That being said, the underlying viewpoint behind the convenient justification is not that controversial on its own because the West was trying to win over Ukraine through various means. This is seen as something akin to nation-building even by some American academics.