Anonymous takes down websites of Defense Ministry, RT and Kremlin
thebarentsobserver.com
thebarentsobserver.com
Really? I though RT was part of Russia's foreign propaganda effort, so I wouldn't expect it to have much effect on domestic news consumption. IIRC, actually Russians get their news from domestic outlets like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia-1 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channel_One_Russia.
This is good news, but mainly because it interferes with Russia's foreign propaganda operations around this attack.
It is clear that RT is propaganda for foreign consumption, not domestic.
That's why we see so many smartphone recordings made by civilians, but not by the military.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgd7dd/google-maps-live-traf...
Seems clear the policy and the reality are not identical here.
"The traffic jam slowly extended to the border, where it then disappeared."
https://www.the-sun.com/news/4757640/russian-soldiers-tinder...
"RUSSIAN soldiers began bombarding Ukraine yesterday — with Tinder messages looking for love."Broadsheets are physically bigger, more text, typically more serious, aiming at a more sophisticated reader
Tabloids physically smaller, more salacious, aiming at the mass market
(Many broadsheets became smaller to save printing costs over time, but the categories still apply)
That said, if they were posting on TikTok that's another story.
That being said, the underlying viewpoint behind the convenient justification is not that controversial on its own because the West was trying to win over Ukraine through various means. This is seen as something akin to nation-building even by some American academics.
So while yes, it is the smart thing to do it definitely isn't what happens in reality.
Yes they do, all the time. I don't think anyone left the wire without their phone while I was in Afghanistan.
And it's one thing to not expect the Taliban to DF your phones. The Ukrainian military, especially with prior control of the cell infrastructure, is another story.
Commercial telecommunications are an important part of any military worldwide, when they are available - so you use them until someone actually starts DFing you accurately, and then even after that, it's a risk to be managed and certainly not black & white.
"Sir yes sir!"
How effective do you think this would really be for most?
Most likely they are lying to look more sympathetic - there is a video of a Ukrainian soldier asking questions to a captured tank crew member. He said "We were told we are doing exercises". Ukrainian solder responded "I've hearing the same shit since 2014"
Given the choice, I'd definitely rather have Zelensky than Putin, but preferably not either. The world doesn't need more celebrity politicians. (I recognise that the US is scarcely a model here; I can only plead that I didn't want any of our celebrity politicians, either.)
EDIT: To be quite clear, this is not meant in any way as anti-Zelenksy. As the child comments say, correctly, he seems to be the leader Ukraine needs right now.
The perfect president does not exist. I’d settle for one with whom you can have a discussion and who does not see the world through the prism of an imaginary past.
Oh, agreed! I certainly wouldn't say that Ukrainians shouldn't be able to select their own leader—they should, and, despite superficial impressions, have done so well. It's just that I hope the world doesn't learn from this that electing comedians is the way to go.
Yeah. Though this one does not seem to behave so badly in the end. No comparison with Trump or Reagan.
To be fair, whilst not a populist, I am fed up with career politicians and bland technocrats that are killing politics. We need doctors, lawyers, intellectuals, farmers, businessmen, factory workers, and much more (in no specific order) in our parliaments and amongst our elected people. A sweet spot between reckless clowns and psychopaths would be nice.
"The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride."
Things move slowly but they move!
Germans allow German weapons to be sent to you, Dutch will send. Poland is sending truckloads.
I've already been looking up Norwegian politicians this morning to ask them to somehow get rid of their old law to not export weapons to countries at war (I think it was meant to be against profiting from war, not to prevent helping, in which case maybe it would be OK if they sent it for free? Norway has some seriously good weapons tech so it could help.)
I got an offer the other day that I normally wouldn't take but will possibly take anyway to help oil&gas/defense.
Edit:
Russian athletes will be banned from competitions. Champions League finals will not be in St. Petersburg, World Cup Skiing final will not be in Russia etc.
Whether or not rt.com going down internationally materially affects Vladimir's plans or place in the world, however, is another question.
[1] https://stop-russian-desinformation.near.page/ [2] https://old.reddit.com/r/ukraine/comments/t18qm4/you_can_ddo...
P.S. I'd encourage you to have a look at the js source code before opening this page. It seems to be relatively clean, readable and straightforward indeed.
You can also easily fork it: https://github.com/lostmsu/lostmsu.github.io
I can understand the argument of NATO encircling Russia, but the invasion of a sovereign democracy can't be justified. Russia was on losing track because of Russia, not Ukraine.
how does this change anything? feels more symbolic than anything
I thought these were defacements, but it's just your common DDOS playbook.
So exactly like a real poster.
>like "CIA mind control device"
These sites don't have that kind of power.
An entirely deniable front for US cyberwarfare (or way to rally hacktivists to their cause) seems like a valuable thing for a nation state to create.
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/racist-a...
https://www.kuow.org/stories/extremist-groups-popping-up-lef...
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/07/northwest-fr...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-ne...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.seattletimes.com/seattle-ne...
Hacktivists are not white hat hackers. They are black or grey and justify actions with personal morally. Judge each case by it's own merits. A lot of regular people get treated as terrorists when they do things like hack their school.
I haven't ever heard of white supremacist terrorist. I've heard of terrorist, I've heard of white supremacist, but I don't think the groups bi-sect. What is the last white supremacist terror attack you remember?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_Unit...
Also, you should revisit your hat definitions. White and black hat are a matter of political perspective for each act and issue, but hacktivists are definitively not grey hat.
1995 Oklahoma City bombing, USA, 168 killed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
2019 El Paso Walmart shooting, USA, 23 killed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_El_Paso_shooting
2019 Christchurch Mosque shooting, New Zealand, 51 killed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchurch_mosque_shootings
The New Zealand shooting the fbi wasn't involved.
The El Paso mass shooting was against one group. You don't qualify to be a white supremacist unless you hate everyone not white. That person had a problem with a specific group hardly makes him hate everyone nor was his act against everyone not white.