Basically: please be careful here, a lot of people are going to want to treat this as a smoking gun, and it's not. It sure is interesting though.
Basically: please be careful here, a lot of people are going to want to treat this as a smoking gun, and it's not. It sure is interesting though.
MolBio 102 for software engineers: each amino acid is coded for by 3 RNA bases. However, the number of possible RNA triplets (4^3=64) is greater than the number of amino acids (20), so some amino acids have multiple triplets assigned to them. For instance, both UUA and CUG code for the same amino acid (leucine), but one of them is more efficient to express. The implicit argument is that consistent preferential use of these optimal codons is evidence of genetic engineering rather than natural evolution.
Is this more like a naturally occurring sequence that has been documented before, isolated, and then claimed by the team that isolated it?