Hacker News Reader

Comment by dylan604 | Hacker News Reader

>as one of the two S-1 sats making up the constellation is out of order

I'm having a really hard time calling 2 dots in the sky a constellation. Does 1+ satellites equate to a constellation in satellite owner/operator parlance?

View on HN

The IAU cites Wood L., 2003 who defines a satellite constellation as "a number of similar satellites, of a similar type and function, designed to be in similar, complementary, orbits for a shared purpose, under shared control" [1]. So, Sentinel-1 is a two-satellite constellation, yes.

[1]:

https://www.iau.org/public/themes/satellite-constellations/,

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4615-0431-3_...

The mathematician in me thinks it should be fine to have 1 and 0 satellite constellations as well.

Why? Isn't a constellation a shape? What shape can be inferred from 1 point of information?

quite a lot actually. Especially that kind

A fleet is simply more than one ship traveling together, so it seems to translate fine

In everyday parlance would you say "look at those ships" or "look at that fleet"?

That's all I'm trying to say. I didn't say the term was incorrect. I'm just stating that I have a hard time using the term as it just sounds pompous.

The Sentinels share the same orbit. So far with only one there is a revisit time of 12 days with one, and 6 days with two, with more (planned) even less. But you could have searched that yourself, or not? I wonder what you think of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TanDEM-X & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TerraSAR-X ?

Would convoy be OK?

Unless those satellites are sending messages like "10-4 good buddy", you might upset CW McCall[0] for using the term convoy. There are certain words/terms that evoke a vision in one's mind. Convoy just says 18-wheelers. Fleet conjures multiple ships. Constellation conjures more than 1-2 and constantly visible.

[0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sd5ZLJWQmss

PS. it's not a matter of what I can or can't look up. People here are too uptight and want to correct everyone else. Sometimes, conversations can be had on not whether a word is actually correct, but whether it leaves one with the right "feeling" (ugh, is that allowed on HN, feelings??).

Yah, well. Now that you are saying it, and seeing the frame from that movie, I probably have seen it sometimes. But it didn't stick. CW McCall didn't ring any bells for me. Convoy is just a saying for many vehicles riding together, almost bumper to bumper. It's done for marriage from some ethnic groups. Or after a soccer game. But it's also said for just two vehicles driving together, at least around here. Sedans and SUVs, no Trucks(Semis?) necessary. (Shrug)

And no, feelings are disallowed because 'Resistance is futile!' & 'Prepare to be disassmbled for scanning and upload into the Protomolecule' ;->

(Do these ring any of your bells?)

The constellation Canis Minor is made up of just two stars, so it’s true at least in astronomic parlance :)

> I'm having a really hard time calling 2 dots in the sky a constellation. Does 1+ satellites equate to a constellation in satellite owner/operator parlance?

I'm having a really hard time calling 2 servers in the DC a cluster. Does 1+ servers equate to a cluster in server owner/operator parlance?

I don't know. Does it? You clearly have the answers.

> The most common size for an HA cluster is a two-node cluster, since that is the minimum required to provide redundancy, but many clusters consist of many more, sometimes dozens of nodes.

You clearly don't have an access to a search engine.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-availability_cluster#Node...

Why would I look up something someone else replied with in snark, or something I don't really care about?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com