Honest question, it seems this was tied to her via initials and email…
Couldn’t anyone in theory have made a donation in her name ? Or with those pieces of information if they knew them?
Couldn’t anyone in theory have made a donation in her name ? Or with those pieces of information if they knew them?
Sure, but while linking a person in the first place might be challenging in most donation systems, DISproving a false information donation should be fairly trivial right? While never having used it, looks like GiveSendGo uses credit/debit cards for underlying payment. That means the transaction history is well recorded and traced if you actually wish to share it. If someone was accused of using it and hadn't, they could prove it with a financial transaction list for that period, or subpoena GSG for the name on the card used or a bunch of other ways. Being in the standard financial system means everything is recorded in a centralized manner, which can be a bad thing for privacy but useful in a case like that. You can show that no money came from any account of yours.
I guess it is a culture thing. In France these kind of protests are very common.
Is my boss allowed to fire me because my job performance is poor? Or does he have to wait till the government puts me in jail for being a shitty sys admin?
I do find this idea that speech doesn't carry consequences really foreign and odd.