The first is support - Google isn't in the business of keeping you in business.
The second is that you are turning over all of your internal communication, almost all of which should never leave the company, to a third party.
The second is that you are turning over all of your internal communication, almost all of which should never leave the company, to a third party.
I'm not sure I understand this. Why isn't Google in the business of making sure its paying customers stay in business?
> The second is that you are turning over all of your internal communication, almost all of which should never leave the company, to a third party.
How is this any different from storing source code on GitHub, or using Campfire to communicate?
A very reasonable argument is that you shouldn't be using those either. GitHub is fine for open source projects but if I were involved in writing proprietary code I'd probably not put it up there.
It's also hard to talk percentages -- there are a lot more companies storing source code on private servers than using external hosting. So yes, more stories of that, but it's hard to talk percentage chance rather than absolute numbers.
Where does one draw the line?