>If I transacted in, say, cans of beans, would that also undermine sovereignty and control of the economy?
From what I seen in my country's past the government will always get the blame and is asked to pay when people get scammed, then the goverment adds new laws to prevent future scams.
Say you borrow some money to buy a house and you use a foreign currency, and a year later that currency doubles, you get screwed. This actually happened and people asked the government to fix it. Sorry for poor details I don't like financial stuff so avoid it if possible
https://www.businessinsider.com/the-swiss-franc-surge-crushe...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caritas_(Ponzi_scheme)
It's obvious that giving the power to crash your economy to a foreign group is losing sovereignty, what happens if some hackers or government crashes bitcoin? I suspect the government will be blamed as usual because it did not see it coming and prevent it.
As long as the government is not imposed by a foreign nation or some Illuminati then I would say the majority of the population should also take all the criticism not only the institution.
IMO if the population wants the government to protect them from scams and foreign financial group playing with their money then it is what it is, a weakness of democracy, where majority rules.