Where does the law say that hacking websites you don’t like without their permission is OK then?
If for whatever reason you don’t like what they are doing, just report that specific group to the authorities.
Oh dear. Just as extreme as hacktivist groups like Anonymous then who everyone knows that they are on no-one’s side.
Well, yeah. Whether the protesters are misinformed or not is irrelevant, they are seeking to highlight their grievances.
You can't very well claim that people should only be able to highlight grievances that they personally, individually and without any external influence ... came up with themselves.
A grievance is still a grievance even if it was brought to the protestor's attention by a foreign power, by a local politician, by their neighbour or by the invisible green elves who live at the bottom of the protestor's garden.
1. You don't get to gatekeep that a grievance is valid only if it comes from the right[1].
2. You don't get to gatekeep that any and all grievances from the left[1] are automatically invalid.
3. You don't get to gatekeep that some things are legitimate grievances and others are not. If 1000 verified working-class people with jobs are literally peacefully protesting, maybe you shouldn't be feeling threatened?
[1] Switch the words 'left' and 'right' in this comment; the point is the same.
That’s the point. Either you agree with both or neither
What is unreasonable about ending mandates and rejecting the idea of the passport? I'm all for it!