This seems pathological. I'm wondering if we need to look at doing a better job in terms of requiring/tracking corporate lineage.

The "Name on the building", as it were, represents a valuable lever for the public to identify and hold to account the management that makes their lives hell. Whipping up a new legal fiction, changing faces, but keeping the same people at the top needs to not be as trivial as it seems to have become, especially if the Courts are treating these entities as distinct instead of as a wrapper or veneer on the same rotten core.