I wish that instead of expanding into proxying even more world traffic, they'd look at not actively protecting organised online abuse, death threats, etc. for a change. Fun tech, but a very irresponsible company.
It's not about being a publishing platform vs infrastructure. They're literally at the level of going to court to protect criminals from being prosecuted because the criminals are their customers. Once you actively protect someone from being prosecuted for swatting and keep them as customers, it's really meaningless what law quirk you use to justify it.