Point is, the apparent loan is greater than their entire assets and much greater than all their liabilities.
Unless this 1 publicly traded bank is carrying trillions in secret liabilities, why would they even borrow that much from the Fed.
Point is, the apparent loan is greater than their entire assets and much greater than all their liabilities.
Unless this 1 publicly traded bank is carrying trillions in secret liabilities, why would they even borrow that much from the Fed.
For example, assume that I lend you $1000 for one day. The following day you pay me back $1000 plus interest, and I lend you $1000 for another day. We keep going for 1000 days, rolling over the debt. TFA would say I have lent you $1M. In reality, I have lent you $1000 for three years or so.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/01/28/what-is-t...
It’s a large numbers market. I guess that’s why TFA liked it. It gave them big scary numbers to use.
Why would you cumulate overnight repos…
Why do you think this?
First, TFA states as much: "repo program that provided nearly $20 TRILLION in cumulative loans to Wall Street".
Second, the Sep 2019 repo crisis is well-known, it lasted multiple weeks, and it was big enough that the Fed wrote a postmortem about it: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/what... You can read the details, but the Fed offered very short-term loans in the range of tens of billions, rolled over for an unusually long time.