Providing a TL;DR version of an article can be valuable, but only if you hit high enough precision and recall rates.

Here, your comment only talks about the article's main points, giving it a high precision rate. However, out of three key ideas you managed to forget a whole third of the author's conclusion. This makes the recall rate woefully inadequate.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_and_recall

And guidance on how to fix it.